HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Can pressure vessel analysis and design become mainstream technology?

2018-06-12View Original

Thread Content

Although analysis and design of pressure vessels have evolved over several decades, their use in practical engineering applications remains limited; they still represent a niche technology. In China, there may be 100,000 people working in this field, but only about 1% of them, or roughly 1,000 people, truly possess the skills needed for analysis and design. As for whether such techniques will become mainstream in the future, I think it’s unlikely, for the following reasons: 1. The pressure vessel industry is a traditional one with high levels of risk, and designers bear lifelong responsibility for their work. I believe no one would be willing to compromise on safety just to save costs. Moreover, I’ve seen many people in this industry become more conservative as they get older; as a result, the goals of ensuring quality and controlling costs remain mere slogans – it’s very difficult to balance these two aspects, and the priority should always be safety; 2. As for the level of conventional design in China, the author believes that there is still much room for development and improvement in this area. A great deal of work is needed to perfectly integrate the theories and experiences related to conventional design in order to raise the standard of such design for pressure vessels ; 3. Although the concept of analytical design is much more advanced than that of conventional design, allowing for the full utilization of the load-bearing capabilities of materials and enabling a true cost-based approach to the design of pressure vessels, given the current state of development in analytical design, it is still primarily used for the verification of individual critical components, rather than the entire equipment being designed using this method. Given the current level of design expertise in China, there is still much room for improvement in conventional design, let alone analytical design; it will at least not become the dominant technique for pressure vessel design in the short term. So is it still necessary for us to learn *analytical design? It is certainly necessary, and one must learn it*. As for the reasons, it’s up to readers to figure them out on their own. Public accounts focused on the analysis and design of pressure vessels are too niche, so it’s difficult for anyone to keep working with them; however, “ANSYS Analysis and Design Expert” has persisted throughout, and will continue to do so. This account shares openly all the original knowledge it has acquired, as there is much that cannot be learned from books. We hope that “ANSYS Analysis and Design Expert” will become a gathering place for those interested in the analysis and design of pressure vessels, where we can learn together and grow together! Those interested in analytical design, take a look. Please be gentle when moderators delete posts! The HaiChuan Forum should possess the spirit of embracing everything. We are doing our part to contribute to the pressure vessel industry, in order to encourage more people to get involved in analysis and design work!
Reply #22018-06-12
I hope everyone will come in and share their opinions
Reply #32018-06-12
I pay attention to “ANSYS Analysis and Designers”; both the papers and case studies in it are very detailed and professional. I truly admire the actions of the original poster. Pressure vessels are a niche industry, and even fewer people work in analysis and design within it. Under such circumstances, the original poster still manages to continue creating content for their official account – I really appreciate that.
Reply #42018-06-13
Analysis and design are used in the process of obtaining ASME certification. I only used it at that time
Reply #52018-06-13
Help out, the OP is great:lol
Reply #62018-06-13
The widespread adoption of analytical design has a long way to go. The analysis and design standards have not been updated in a timely manner to date. Moreover, pressure vessels belong to the low-value-added manufacturing sector; analysis and design may not effectively reduce costs, but rather increase the workload associated with design, thereby hindering design efficiency. Even for fatigue vessels, they must be designed in accordance with the analytical design standard JB4732, and their proportion is not high, usually less than 2%.
Reply #72018-06-14
This is the perfect time for the younger generation of engineers to learn *analytical design
Reply #82018-06-14
Just as forums were once very popular, they began to decline within just a few years; now their popularity is far less than it used to be, and things can change quite suddenly
Reply #92018-06-14
Engineering technology differs from theoretical research or experimentation; it is simple, practical, safe, economical, and reliable. A comparative analysis of conventional design and analytical design is necessary, and at present, the dominant position of conventional design remains unchanged.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.