HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

What kind of container is a autoclave?

2019-04-26View Original

Thread Content

Is a autoclave for burning hollow bricks a reaction vessel? Please offer some guidance from those who are more experienced
Reply #22019-04-26
It is a reaction vessel in which building materials such as silicates undergo a reaction at a certain temperature over a period of time, resulting in construction bricks with certain strength and stiffness.
Reply #32019-04-27
Since the hollow brick does not come into contact with the metal wall of the container, does it still count as a reaction vessel?
Reply #42019-04-29
It is generally of a quick-opening design, with specialized manufacturers for producing it.
Reply #52019-06-06
Whether there is a reaction depends on whether the substances inside undergo a change and turn into another substance. If there are no intelligent heat-exchange containers. No one will go to such great lengths to make these distinctions.
Reply #62019-06-09
This post was last edited by wanlirn on 2019-6-9 at 15:36. Steam autoclaves, classified by type, are considered storage containers of category C. I have seen many drawings of such devices; steam autoclaves belong to the category of fast-opening fatigue-resistant containers, and their doors must be designed by personnel holding an S certificate. For other components, those with a D-level certificate are sufficient (design institutes usually have personnel with S certificates). The interlock mechanism needs to undergo type testing, or it is also possible to use drawings from other manufacturers that have already been put into use. However, such drawings are not easy to find. My colleague’s company produces fast-opening steam autoclaves, paint dipping tanks, and ball receiving/transmitting cylinders on a regular basis. If you have any questions, I can help you ask around
Reply #72019-06-09
Strictly speaking, it should be analyzed and designed as a fatigue vessel.
Reply #82019-06-09
Conduct analysis and design based on the fatigue-resistant container
Reply #92019-06-10
In fact, they are not designed as fatigue-resistant vessels; instead, they are designed in accordance with GB/T150, and this is the case across the country. Due to fierce competition, designing containers for fatigue conditions simply doesn’t yield any profits. The supervision departments turn a blind eye. This is what’s known as the unspoken rules, I guess. When applying for a manufacturing certificate, experts avoid autoclave products.
Reply #102019-06-10
It is a reaction vessel, designed in accordance with GB/T150 as a whole, with fatigue stress analysis performed on the vessel door area

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.