HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Help needed! What is the difference between pipe alignment in heat exchangers with pipes arranged across the center and those with pipes arranged at the center?

2020-06-03View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by WallaceLee on 2020-6-3 21:52. When performing tube routing design for heat exchangers in HGCAD, I encountered the two concepts of \"centered tube routing\" and \"mid-span tube routing\": I drew my own diagrams showing the tube arrangement in a triangular pattern and a square pattern within the tube side. 1. Figure 1 2. Figure 2 3. Figure 3 Now my question is: 1. I want to know what the differences are between the two piping methods of center-aligned piping and mid-span piping? Are there any standards or literature that explain these two piping methods? 2. Is there anyone who can explain to me, with the help of images, what center-aligned piping and mid-span piping are? Is this related to the number of pipes? Is it related to triangular or square arrangements? 3. Is it correct to say that centered piping means there is a pipe at the exact center, while mid-span piping means there is no pipe at the exact center? 4. Could you explain what type of piping method is used in each of the three images I uploaded?
Reply #22020-06-04
It is generally used in horizontal pipelines to prevent corrosion of the bolts directly below in case of leaks, and it also facilitates tightening when multiple pipelines run side by side
Reply #32020-06-04
Could that explain the structural difference between spanning and centering?
Reply #42020-06-04
Page 17 of GB/T151-2014
Reply #52020-06-04
But there isn’t any explanation on centered piping or piping across the center on the entire page
Reply #62020-06-04
Personal opinion: There is not much difference between aligning the heat exchange tubes centrally or across the center; when the diameters are the same and the specifications of the heat exchange tubes are identical, the only change is in the number of tubes used. It doesn’t have any special meaning. It is just a method of arranging the heat exchange tubes. It has no impact on the strength of the heat exchanger or its heat transfer efficiency.
Reply #72020-06-05
It’s just a matter of quantity; usually I don’t pay attention to this in design – as long as there’s enough, that’s fine

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.