Thread Content
I would like to ask whether, for the replacement of the nozzle, flange, and reinforcement plate on the level gauge port of a Class II pressure vessel (tank) with DN50, it is necessary to submit a notification or undergo inspection; thank you! According to the requirements of the TSG21-2016 Regulations on Safety Inspection of Fixed Pressure Vessels, nozzles and flanges with a diameter of DN250mm or less are not considered primary pressure-bearing components; therefore, is it not necessary to carry out any notification procedures or inspection?
This needs to be reported and notified to the Special Inspection Agency. It is necessary to clarify the meaning of this phrase here: “not a primary stressed element” does not mean “a non-stressed element”; rather, it means “not primary, but rather secondary; however, it still requires sufficient attention.” ” Then, from a construction perspective, to maintain the original welding quality, it is necessary to pay attention to the welders (who must hold the required certifications), the welding materials (selected based on the cylinder and pipe types, as well as the requirements specified in the original drawings), the pipe materials (such as their material composition and wall thickness), and the welding procedures, among other things. Let me add that since reinforcement rings are involved, this means the openings here need to be reinforced separately; in other words, calculations must be done and proper attention must be given to this. It is even possible to have separate non-destructive testing requirements on the drawings. Finally, after you have made the repairs, a pressure test is also required. When operating equipment, safety comes first. Without proper supervision, there is a high risk of quality issues after maintenance is carried out. To be able to sleep soundly, it’s better to complete the necessary reporting procedures as required.
A screenshot taken specifically to give a brief look at the definition. Flanged pipe fittings are designed to withstand pressure loads. This needs to be made clear.
During replacement, cut off the pipe fitting, then attach a new one along with the flange; do not remove the pipe fitting from the microdevice, thus avoiding the need for monitoring. However, if the reinforcing rings and pipe clamps are all removed from the housing and new ones are welded in, supervision and inspection will be required.
Does digging a pipe from the tank body for the equipment port count as modifying the main body? Main pressure components
Is it considered part of the pressure vessel body within the first sealing surface? When digging the pipe seat, is it necessary to move the cylinder body? Is the cylinder considered a primary compression member? Since the pipe socket has been subjected to strength calculations and is equipped with a reinforcement ring structure, does that mean there is a weak point at the opening of this pipe? Is a pressure test required after welding a reinforcement ring to the pipe socket? Is the entire welding process documented, including records of the welder’s credentials and the materials used? With the cylinder repaired by patching and the pressure-bearing components replaced, how can this not be considered major repairs?
Of course it does; the original cylinder structure is damaged, requiring re-welding and reinforcement, with strict requirements for both welding methods and dimensions.
Within the first sealing surface, it is considered to be inside the pressure vessel equipment. There are size limitations on the butt joint of the takeover ring. You can do this this time, but during the next internal and external inspections of the equipment, if the inspector is strict, then that equipment is doomed to be scrapped. Because it is different from the original design. Without records of the materials used and the welding process, who can guarantee the quality of the equipment? Compared to potential safety accidents, what is more important: the money spent on monitoring? Many people get stuck on the concept of the \"primary stressed element,\" ignoring the fact that not everything other than the primary stressed element is a non-stressed element; it’s not a black-and-white situation. This is a common-sense mistake, as well as a result of insufficient understanding of special equipment.