On the strengthening of edgeless conical shells

2022-12-02View Original

Thread Content

GB150: Unflanged conical shells under internal pressure – determination of the reinforcement details at the large-end connections, Figure 5-11, p.124. For the same semi-cone angle, when deciding whether reinforcement is necessary, no reinforcement is required for lower pressures, while reinforcement is needed for higher pressures. What exactly is the reason behind this? Is it because of formula 5-8 that the calculated thickness is larger at high pressures? So there’s no need to increase the thickness anymore?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

On the strengthening of edgeless conical shells

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links