Should the original or a copy of the special equipment use label be posted on-site?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by jmdc on 2023-5-16 21:56. Should the original or a copy of the special equipment usage label be posted on site?
The original use mark for special equipment should be displayed on-site, as the original is better able to prove the authenticity and validity of the mark, thereby effectively preventing forgery and misuse. During use on-site, if signs are found to be damaged or missing, they need to be replaced promptly, and updates should be made as soon as possible. .
It doesn’t matter; anyway, everything will be replaced next year. Moreover, the inspectors only check whether it has been posted or not, and they don’t look at whether it’s the original or not. The authenticity is verified by checking the system, which also contains a QR code.
If you put it that way, then there’s actually no need to attach even copies. Is there any documentation? The inspectors just check it in the system; what’s the point of looking at it on the wall? To look at his mother?
Posting is a requirement of technical specifications; it depends on whether the regulations are good or not.
An original is not required, but failing to post it is illegal; the supervision authorities can order rectification within a specified time frame； If the violation is not corrected within the prescribed time, the use of the relevant special equipment shall be ordered to be stopped, and a fine of not less than 10,000 yuan but not more than 100,000 yuan shall be imposed. Looking at the laws and regulations, arguing with the poster is just too pointless.
The usage marks for special equipment are divided into usage registration marks and regular inspection marks; they have the same design and are collectively referred to as usage marks for special equipment. There are three styles, corresponding to different categories of special equipment; industrial vehicles also come with license plates. Basically, it is issued for the first time by the issuing authority, and after regular inspections it is issued by the inspection agency. Some still have a usage mark after annual inspections, but no evidence was found for this.
This post was last edited by sunlb37 on 2023-5-16 09:42
Postings on-site are intended for supervision or verification by relevant personnel present at the site who may be associated with the equipment, such as equipment operators and those using the equipment, in order to prevent accidents caused by malfunctioning equipment. It’s the same principle as displaying a business license. It is still mainly used for management purposes by the supervisory authorities.
The use of markings is intended to comply with **laws. Abroad, devices are equipped with unique identification numbers; in China, this practice is rarely used – people usually rely on the nameplate, and if that nameplate is missing, they compare the device with the corresponding drawings to determine if it matches. With the same image showing the devices, it’s impossible to tell which one is which. The signs are placed haphazardly, just like the internal numbers; even nameplates can be put in the wrong place, so there are countless signs that are posted incorrectly.