HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Is it a bit too small that the slide is only 0.5~1 higher than the baffle?

2023-05-21View Original

Thread Content

The last edit to this post was made by zhangjuhua on 2023-5-21 at 14:28. Dear everyone, is it appropriate for the GB151 slide to be only 0.5~1 units higher than the baffle? For larger diameters, this difference of 0.5~1 means a certain degree of eccentricity; moreover, if the baffle is close to the inner wall, it will increase friction
Reply #22023-05-21
In slide design, the height difference should generally be more than twice the height of the baffle. If the slide is only 0.5 to 1 higher than the baffle, it may cause problems such as eccentricity and increased friction for objects with large diameters. Therefore, it is recommended to increase the height difference appropriately during design to avoid these issues. .
Reply #32023-05-30
For those with a large diameter, this type of plate-based marking method should not be used; for heavy items, pulleys should be employed

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.