I’m building a new warehouse for hazardous chemicals. Sinopec’s headquarters requires the installation of facilities for adsorbing hazardous gases, but I couldn’t find any relevant regulations regarding this. I’m not sure how to proceed; if anyone has relevant information, I would be grateful if you could share it with me. .
Thread Content
The hazardous chemicals warehouse is equipped with absorption facilities
Check what types of hazardous chemicals are stored in your hazardous materials warehouse; if that’s not possible, get some boxes of activated carbon. Under normal circumstances, the packaging of hazardous chemicals is quite airtight, with volatility levels that are not unacceptable. If gas absorption facilities are installed, is it then necessary to set up additional washing and detoxification facilities as well?
You can refer to the requirements specified in the \"Standards for Pollution Control of Hazardous Waste Storage\" (GB 18597-2001) when carrying out these actions. The specific scale should be determined based on the types and quantities of hazardous waste stored there; in general, spray systems and activated carbon adsorption devices are necessary, and ventilation ducts should be installed within the warehouse.
It seems like nothing was seen; no hazardous materials warehouse has been set up either. What substances are you storing?
Ventilation is available, and the volatilization rate is very low; both meet the national standards for emissions, so the owner can proceed with it. . .
They are all catalysts; there are some volatile liquids as well, all of which are stored in sealed containers
Yes, they are all sealed, which is why there’s confusion; the measured amount of volatilization is also very small
You can entrust a third-party environmental testing company to conduct the tests and issue a \"Test Analysis Report.\"
They have already obtained the results themselves; the supervisors don’t understand much about technology, so they rely solely on the experts’ opinions, and the experts just follow the established standards.
It seems that the leadership at headquarters isn’t very professional either.
Sometimes it’s not a matter of lack of professionalism, but rather modular work – after checking one thing, one has to look at other things; who would take the time to verify the actual situation carefully?