HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Gentlemen, regarding the issue of geometric tolerances

2022-05-14View Original

Thread Content

As shown in the figure, as long as there are datums A and B, it's enough. As long as the axis meets the position requirements between datums A and B, it's fine. Why do we need to add datum C? Isn’t it possible without a C benchmark? And shouldn’t the verticality between the axis and the c datum be marked?
Reply #22022-05-14
This post was last edited by lijie2007521 on 2022-5-14 16:07. The picture in the picture is the position. The ideal position of the axis is determined by the theoretically correct dimensions relative to the system of three base planes. This position tolerance gives two mutually perpendicular directions relative to the datum. The meaning of 0.1 is that the axes of each measured hole must be located in two pairs of mutually perpendicular distances with a tolerance value of 0.1mm. Between two parallel planes arranged symmetrically in an ideal position determined by the theoretically correct dimensions relative to the reference surfaces A, B, and C. Hope this explanation helps you.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.