Discussion on the design responsibilities for design projects
Thread Content
On Zhihu, I saw discussions regarding design, proofreading, review, approval, and the responsibilities of the person in charge of a project; one view expressed was that “the person who signs off is the one who is responsible.” The link is here: https://www.zhihu.com/question/21518910. For process-related drawings, there is basically no requirement for a seal from a registered chemical engineer; yet in reality, the risks associated with the process aspects are often the highest. This is especially true in smaller design firms, where process designers have to work on projects with great caution.
Using the money from selling cabbages to engage in drug trafficking
There is no distinction between courtyard craftsmanship and systems; downstream specialties await your qualifications. The conditions proposed are incorrect; how should responsibility be divided?
Generally, it is young and inexperienced people who do the design work, while experienced individuals handle the review; therefore, they are the ones with experience and should be held accountable in the end. In fact, design is like having young people do the tough physical work of building the structure, after which the experienced professionals come in to refine it. As for tasks such as drawing pipelines, experienced engineers are certainly capable of handling them, and there’s no need to waste time on that; instead, such tasks are given to those with less experience, who are then responsible for producing the final product. Whoever produces the final product is also responsible for ensuring its quality
Those who provide the process packages are responsible for any issues related to those processes. Of course, problems related to the system fall under the responsibility of the process specialists. Many so-called senior process engineers in smaller companies can only talk but are afraid to take responsibility; in other words, they simply lack the necessary skills