The on-site operator had been working there for half a year yet still didn’t know the opening/closing status of the valve!
Thread Content
The on-site operator has been working there for a year yet still doesn’t know the opening/closing status of the valve! How should it be handled? How should it be punished?
It seems the valve has never been operated. It depends on his major, job description, and specific duties, right? If the work requirements are not met, re-assessment will be conducted; those who pass will remain, while those who fail will be reassigned to another role.
Isn’t that just one year of wasted time? I think the master should be held accountable; regardless of the apprentice’s character, the master failed to fulfill his responsibilities first and foremost, both towards his superiors and towards the apprentice
It’s usually handled through an apprenticeship agreement; just deduct from his master’s payment, and someone will take care of dealing with him. There’s no way around not learning from the master; it has to be said that that guy really doesn’t learn at all~~~~ Maybe he’s afraid of doing the work, so even if he knows how, he won’t do it~~~ You know, working there involves a lot of trickery and deception – that’s what a team leader is like: they deceive people both inside and outside, plus they use intimidation. In fact, they’re not good people even after a few years~~~~ There are so many complexities involved~~~~ Just get used to it~~~ It’s enough to do one’s own job properly~~~
These days, it’s still possible to get by for a year like this, yet people always say it’s hard to make ends meet. This is too dangerous; after all, there are differences in the chemical industry. It seems there really is no fate involved
It’s probably an internal operation; there’s probably no chance to turn the valves either: lol
The person mentioned by the poster is the on-site operator. .
This is a safety hazard; it requires tier-3 training and mentorship assessment. To be more precise, there are quite a many types of valves – is it too much to learn? For valves that are simply encountered frequently, if one isn’t able to handle them, then training should be provided through the existing training system; yet it’s likely that they still won’t learn how to use them, so in that case, the best option is to dismiss them. How terrifying is that? !
What valve? It can be difficult to determine whether certain valves are open or closed on site; for example, in the case of globe valves, the valve stem extends outside for a long distance, making it hard to tell whether the valve is open or closed. It’s necessary to analyze the situation based on specific circumstances
This issue should be analyzed objectively. First, it is necessary to determine whether the training provided is adequate. It’s possible that you have indeed explained the relevant procedures, but the employees may not understand why they need to follow those procedures. Therefore, when training new employees, it is important not only to tell them what to do but also why they need to do it, as well as what consequences will arise if they do not follow those instructions. Additionally, it is essential to check periodically whether the employees have mastered the required skills at the beginning of their tenure. If the training is sufficient yet the problem persists, then it’s time to consider assigning them to a different role.