HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Calculate the enthalpy difference and specific heat for heat

2017-08-12View Original

Thread Content

There is a problem in calculating the heat consumption of heat transfer oil in computing systems: since heat transfer oil is a liquid without any phase change, the enthalpy difference values from data tables used to calculate heat changes differ significantly from those calculated using the average specific heat. Which one should I choose? How to choose among similar calculations. When calculating steam, the change in heat can be determined directly using the enthalpy difference; can the same method be used here?
Reply #22017-08-12
This post was last edited by arpcd on 2017-8-12 20:01. Careless poster. . . Even middle school students make mistakes in unit conversions that are supposed to be easy? ℉It’s 1.8 times different from °C(K); of course, multiplying the specific heat value in K by the temperature difference in °F won’t give the correct result. Just pick any two values and use a calculator to do the calculation; for example, 0°F and 20°F. Use the average specific heat value: Cp = (1.77 + 1.81)/2 = 1.79 kJ/kg·K. Note that the unit for temperature difference here is K, which is the same as °C. So the temperature difference is ΔT = (-7) – (-18) = 11°C = 11K. The amount of heat then is Q = Cp * ΔT = 1.79 * 11 = 19.69 kJ/kg. . . If you calculate using the enthalpy difference, then Q=ΔH=19.9–0=19.9 kJ/kg. What difference can there be between these two values? ? ? Your mistake was using the specific heat of K while plugging in the Fahrenheit temperature difference (which is 20°F in this case) into the formula; of course, this resulted in a large error. Moreover, this error was exactly 1.8 times larger, which is precisely the conversion factor between°F and °C (1.8). . . Americans find this table the most convenient to use. Why? ? Because they* use imperial units, and as I’ve said many times, European and American technicians* prefer to use kcal or the imperial unit BTU when calculating calories; what the original poster posted is a typical example of this. Still with that previous example, it looks much simpler to Americans. . . No one cares about metric units. . . For specific heat, the value is simply given as Btu/lb-℉ (the temperature difference is in Fahrenheit, so it’s 20℉ here). The value in terms of enthalpy is also Btu/lb; this table uses 0℉ as a reference point, and by subtracting 20℉ from that value, we get 8.6 Btu/lb. Calculating it using specific heat yields the same result: Q = (0.423 + 0.433)/2 * 20 = 8.56 Btu/lb. Isn’t that the same? ? Our students find it troublesome just to deal with things like Fahrenheit, British thermal units, and pounds; they’re not even familiar with units like cal. . . . So be careful when looking at American materials. . . Pay special attention to the units. .

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.