Regarding the head design, and what standard is used for the equipment’s length-to-diameter ratio?

2019-05-24View Original

Thread Content

Regarding the design dimensions of the head, and also the length-to-diameter ratio of the equipment, which standards are used as a basis?

Reply #22019-05-24

Excerpted from HG/T20583-2011

Reply #32019-05-24

For the length-to-diameter ratio of the equipment, the available space on site must be considered first, followed by cost efficiency.

Reply #42019-05-24

Is it related to the properties of the material? Are there any calculation formulas, for example, for the design of equipment with agitators?

Reply #52019-05-24

The reaction vessel is related to the materials, such as viscosity, and must be determined by the process engineering team.

Reply #62019-05-24

The typical length-diameter ratio is about 1 to 1.5, right?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

Regarding the head design, and what standard is used for the equipment’s length-to-diameter ratio?

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links