【Series Discussions on School Establishment, Review in HaiChuan】Responsibilities and Weightings of Establishment, Review, and Approval in Design Institutes
Thread Content
This post was last edited by Wise Ming on 2019-9-13 at 15:43. It is beyond doubt that design drawings cannot become construction drawings without signatures; once signed, they acquire legal validity. Moreover, one is responsible for the signed drawings for life; therefore, one cannot sign casually. The designer is responsible for 60%~65%, the professional in charge bears 20%~30%, proofreading accounts for 10%, review is 5%, and final approval is 5%. Generally, it is done according to this ratio. But when problems arise, it comes down to conscience; some people refuse to take responsibility and blame the design instead. One should not sign casually; it is necessary to carefully examine the diagram before signing, only when there are no issues can one sign. Tell me how your department implements it?
The high quality of courtyard design depends not on individual effort, but on institutional mechanisms. A mature design institute has a complete three-level review system that ensures design quality remains consistent regardless of changes in personnel. As a professionally structured design institute, it is generally necessary to implement a system of two reviews and three checks. That is: the designer conducts self-checking and self-review ； Proofreader Proofreading ； Reviewed by the auditor. A drawing must be signed by at least three people before it can be approved, in order to ensure design quality.
Should criminal liability be pursued for the consequences of design flaws? https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1752114-1-1.html (Source: Haichuan Chemical Industry Forum)
Large design institutes are still the most reliable; their drawings are basically error-free. Although some smaller design institutes also follow the three-level signing process, their drawings are full of errors and flaws, causing a lot of trouble for people!
The courtyard project is being rushed, with various missing documents throughout the process. . When pushing for progress, reviewers sometimes can’t examine things carefully; the experience of designers is definitely inferior to that of proofreaders and reviewers. . This role of oversight was not fulfilled. It can only be said that working was done with constant anxiety
Nowadays, all construction sites are in a state of transformation, and the quality of blueprints is getting worse. However, it depends on your industry; in some industries, drawings are really not important!
With the transformation of the compound, has some of the design work actually been outsourced to smaller design firms? I disagree with you--in some industries, drawings are really not important!
The high quality of courtyard design depends not on individual effort, but on institutional mechanisms. I agree with you; it’s a team project, a well-structured team project
Outsourcing is something completely normal! In some industries, such as the environmental protection sector where I work, drawings aren’t that important at all; many clients don’t even require them – as long as the requirements are met, that’s sufficient!
When doing design, it is essential to follow the specifications strictly; this is also a way of protecting oneself
On some drawings, the design parameters are clearly problematic. I don’t know how the review is done either.