Thread Content
Does a similar process, such as one with a different sequence of operations, constitute an infringement of intellectual property rights? How should it be defined? I think the intellectual property rights for many processes are quite similar.
The main rights can be similar, the order may vary, and the content of the subsidiary rights need not be identical to or similar to those required by other patents
It’s hard to explain things related to intellectual property; otherwise, why would there be so many lawsuits over intellectual property? For example: 1. For a certain type of gasification furnace patent that featured burners at the bottom, others conducted research and changed them to side burners, then applied for a new patent ; 2. A patent for a certain type of gasifier features opposing nozzles at the top; after further research, others modified it to use four opposing nozzles at the top and applied for a patent for \"multi-nozzle gasification\". So, is it an infringement or not? It also depends on the skill of your lawyer.
Intellectual property lawsuits are very valuable; if something can be expressed in just one sentence, there’s no need for companies to apply for so many patents, and lawyers would have nothing to do then
Check whether the scope of definition of the existing intellectual property includes order; if not, there is no infringement.