Are shell-and-tube condensers effective for cooling exhaust gases (organic exhaust gases)?
Thread Content
Are shell-and-tube condensers effective for cooling exhaust gases (organic exhaust gases)?
Air flow: 5000 m3/h; Toluene waste gas concentration: 1000 mg/m3
What problems can arise from having a large lung capacity?
In tube-type gas-to-gas heat exchange, the heat transfer coefficient is low; excessive gas flow leads to high equipment costs!
Isn’t the shell-and-tube type causing too high wind pressure losses? Even if it’s positive pressure, what level of wind pressure would that be? We have the same problem; we recommend using a volumetric heat exchanger. .
For exhaust gas recovery, it is best to first use a condenser for deep cooling followed by additional treatment devices, in order to improve efficiency and reduce costs
It is recommended to conduct an evaluation and calculation based on material consumption
Still want to use condensation to treat a toluene concentration of 1000mg/m3? Consider cryogenics – the investment in such equipment, along with its energy consumption, is simply unreasonable. Additionally, defrosting multi-stage cryogenic equipment is a major issue that deserves consideration. Consider adsorption or incineration instead