May I ask whether the swirl plate in the diagram is of the “inward” or “outward” type, and whether it can achieve swirl-based mist removal and droplet elimination?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by FORREST_GUMP on 2020-11-28 at 20:19. I would like to ask the experts in this community: A device uses swirl plates for mist removal. Are these swirl plates of the “inward” or “outward” type? Can they effectively achieve mist removal and the elimination of liquid droplets?
There is an explanation of \"introverted\" and \"extroverted\" in a paper from Zhejiang University, but I didn’t understand it :( Please ask the experts on this forum for help; thank you
Check the instructions below; it’s an external type. It’s not clear whether it can remove fog – it depends on the specific design
The demister is outward-facing, discharging upward in a counterclockwise direction； The swirl plate is inward-facing, moving upward in a clockwise direction. As the air current moves upward, it is deflected and obstructed at the demister, which enables mist removal. It’s correct in principle. If both are inward-facing, the airflow upward will be clockwise; this results in poor defogging effects as well as airflow escaping via short circuits.
Thank you. I just can’t understand the difference between \"extroverted\" and \"introverted\". If the model in the diagram is flipped 180° while all other conditions remain unchanged, it still seems the same
Introverted or extroverted can be determined by the orientation of the blade openings on the swirl plate. Acute and obtuse angles. That is, to check the internal elevation angle and the external elevation angle.
Thank you, I just can’t understand this diagram; everything looks the same.