HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The issue of the equal plate height of the filler

2021-01-14View Original

Thread Content

Dear experts, I would like to ask how the plate height for various types of packing is determined in calculations – is it based on empirical values or calculated using the mass transfer unit coefficient? Searching on Baidu for DN50 packing shows that the plate spacing is 0.9m; different types of packing are likely not interchangeable, right?
Reply #22021-01-15
The term \"plate height\" refers to the height of a packing layer corresponding to one theoretical plate, which is 0.9 meters. This has nothing to do with the type of material being vaporized; the exact number of theoretical plates required for separation is determined through calculations. The actual number of plates is then calculated as 0.5 to 0.7 times the number of theoretical plates. The total height of the packing layer is obtained by multiplying the number of theoretical plates by 0.9 meters. However, each section of the packing layer should not be higher than 6 meters – the reason for this is that an increase in the packing layer height leads to severe channeling effects between the gas and liquid phases, requiring another round of gas-liquid distribution. So the DN50 packing you mentioned also doesn’t come in this model; it is usually a Y-type corrugated packing, available in sizes of 125, 250, 500, 750, 1000, etc. In other words, when one cubic meter of such packing is fully unfolded into flat sheets, the area of those sheets is 125, 250, 750 square meters, and so on.
Reply #32021-01-15
The equivalent plate height for various fillers varies; there are theoretical values for this, but each filler manufacturer has its own empirical limits regarding the minimum acceptable value. It is up to each company to determine what the minimum value should be, and it’s fine to use the standard theoretical values. Professional manufacturers will use values that are higher than these, as competition exists – those who can use less filler will have a price advantage. You don’t need to worry too much about these details; it’s sufficient to stick to the empirical values as a conservative approach. Once again, it has nothing to do with what you steam

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.