Thread Content
When encountering a project, how should one assess whether it can be undertaken? The more comprehensive, the better
Hardware: Do you have the necessary qualifications? Software: Do you have relevant experience? If you don’t even have the ability to determine whether a project can be undertaken and need to consult others for help, it’s better not to take on such projects.
Focus on the money; if the funds are available, one can hire a qualified subcontractor even in the absence of such qualifications. With enough money, one can create things randomly even without experience
Lifelong accountability for construction projects – I’ve been watching Brother Civil Engineer’s videos lately; even if problems arise in projects from 30 years ago, the people involved can still be prosecuted and face serious penalties. I wouldn’t dare create it casually.
Find a capable subcontractor and act as an intermediary; clarify one’s own responsibilities in the contract, with the contract mainly being reviewed by the person in charge, as the higher-ups don’t pay attention to the details. By \"wasting money\" I mean squandering it, not carrying out random construction
What I mean is the second part of what you said: \"Even without experience, one can create things as long as there’s enough money.\" Even if money could be created easily, without experience, it’s likely that one wouldn’t be able to properly avoid taking responsibility for one’s own actions. There are many cases where people can’t figure out contracts, laws, and regulations; they think they have cleared things up, but in reality those provisions are invalid.
My assumption was just a joke; which owner has money that can be created just like that? It’s not a state-owned enterprise
This post was last edited by qugd on 2023-1-4 at 17:04. Actually, it’s quite difficult to determine such issues. Because the information you provided is insufficient for a comprehensive and objective assessment. I think the key factor in determining whether a project can be carried out is whether there are people in the organization who are capable of working on it, or whether it’s possible to find such people. It’s not just a matter of technology or project management; it’s a comprehensive set of skills required. Of course, it also depends on the scale and complexity of the project. For example, one can carry out a minor modification to a process system by adding a few gauges, valves, and one or two containers; there’s no need to hire anyone else, as many people on the forum are capable of doing this work. But if by the project you mean a large-scale integrated oil refining and chemical industry complex, or a complete set of comprehensive coal chemical projects, or even projects similar to China’s Hope Project, then you may have come to the wrong place.