Question! ! Regarding the drawing of Risk 4**
Thread Content
Regarding the drawing of regional risk classification level 4**, is it marked according to the level after the implementation of measures? Should it still be labeled with the risk level indicating the absence of control measures? For example, in the case of a hydrogen station, if subsequent control measures (systems, plans, personal protective equipment, emergency supplies, etc.) are not taken into account, its assessment level is considered severe, or red ； If later measures are taken into account, the evaluation might be average, resulting in a blue rating. But in the eyes of ordinary people, this area is definitely red; even experts don’t believe in your measures, and the managers think you have marked it incorrectly.
When drawing the regional risk classification map, the risk level after the implementation of control measures should be indicated. But at the same time, it is also necessary to detail the measures taken and ensure their effective implementation. If the public or experts have doubts about the assessment results, detailed risk assessment reports and evidence of control measures can be provided to enhance the transparency and credibility of those results. .