Summary on SIS and crew control systems
Thread Content
Summary of SIS and crew control systems: 1. TRICONEX is the company name, while TRICON and Trident are the names of the systems. The TRICON systems commonly used in ITCC or ESD are products of the American company TRICONEX. The company also has another system called Trident. 2. TRICONEX is a subsidiary of Invensys. Invensys is an international company in the field of production technology and energy management, dedicated to helping businesses improve efficiency, enhance performance, and increase profits. Invensys is headquartered in London, UK. Tricon can function as both an ITCC and a SIS. It is what has led to Tricon’s outstanding achievements. ICS technology is similar as well; however, the performance of SIS is not as good as that of Tricon, and the performance of unit ITCCs is also not as good as that of Tricon. The Woodward 505, 505E can only be used for ITCC; it cannot be used for SIS. It lacks TUV certification and does not meet safety regulations. CCC can only be used for ITCC, not for SIS; it lacks TUV certification and does not meet safety standards. HIMA generally only works on SIS, not ITCC. So many projects adopt a HIMA + CCC combination. HIMA handles SIS, while CCC handles ITCC. The cost of combined solutions is generally relatively high. Honeywell’s FSC generally only handles SIS, not ITCC.
Perspicuous, but could you further summarize the differences and connections between SIS and ITCC?
Should this be summarized? They’re all expensive solutions – isn’t it better to find something more cost-effective?
You’ll understand it once you know what SIS and ITCC mean respectively; hardware and software are the same in both cases, it’s just that one is a safety instrument system while the other is an engine control system
Is this a sales pitch? There is such a suspicion! :D
Nonsense – domestic products and Allen-Bradley control systems are different; DCS can be used in either case, but it’s just for passing inspections
Tricon can function as both an ITCC and a SIS. It is what has led to Tricon’s outstanding achievements. Is Tricon’s ITCC something promoted by Beijing Kangjisen? Is Triconex using ITCC abroad? What this implies is that it is only Kangjisen itself who is promoting Tricon’s ITCC (aside from some compressor manufacturers such as Shengyu); can anyone tell me more about this?
TRICONEX is a subsidiary of Invensys; Invensys was acquired by Schneider, and the company no longer exists. To be precise, TRICONEX is Woodward 505, a subsidiary of Schneider; the 505E model can only be used for ITCC purposes and not for SIS applications. It lacks TUV certification and therefore does not meet safety standards. CCC can only be used for ITCC, not for SIS; it lacks TUV certification and does not meet safety standards. Woodward is mainly focused on speed control; it cannot handle ITCC on its own ； CCC is mainly used for anti-surge protection, and it cannot function as an ITCC on its own.