Thread Content
I currently work on automatic control design at a small design firm. A company has approached us for small automation projects. This new company is just starting out, and the work involves design, installation, and commissioning. Which option is better and more promising?
The design institute doesn’t need to be mobile; it’s the projects that require mobility, which somewhat affects friendships
It is a dilemma: choosing an engineering design firm allows one to gain experience in design work, which can serve as a foundation for moving to larger organizations in a technical role; the salary prospects are good, and the workplace is generally fixed, but there is a lot of overtime required during busy periods. When choosing to work with a small company on a full-service basis, it is important to consider the company’s future prospects. If those prospects are good, it is possible to gain comprehensive experience in all aspects of the work – design, installation, commissioning, and operation. This experience can be useful even if one moves to a design firm later, where tasks such as design and project management are involved. However, there will be more on-site work, and the working conditions may be less favorable; nonetheless, the income at this stage is likely to be somewhat higher.
See which of the two can enrich oneself more.
In terms of future prospects, the latter is better.
Working for the design institute is fine, but going to the construction site is tiring. I know people who work at design institutes
It’s all about who has better financial prospects and more potential strength; everything else is unimportant! :D