HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Selection of glands for increased-safety junction boxes

2018-07-06View Original

Thread Content

For flameproof junction boxes, we generally use flameproof glands; for intrinsically safe junction boxes, we use ordinary glands with certain protective capabilities. But what about increased safety junction boxes? In practical design, we often focus on using flameproof glands, but upon reflection, is that really appropriate? In theory, glands with increased safety certification should be used; the principles of explosion isolation and increased safety for explosion protection are different, and the performance requirements for such glands also vary. What design do you people actually use in practice?
Reply #22018-08-22
Our company produces intrinsically safe and flameproof double-certified Gran products
Reply #32018-08-22
Adding explosion protection enhances safety; I don’t think there’s any issue with that. Using a higher-grade version for a lower-grade application – you’d better consult the manufacturer for details.
Reply #42018-08-24
The enhanced safety junction box, equipped with flameproof connectors, is fine.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.