Thread Content
Calcium carbide manufacturers are increasingly paying attention to the development of SIS systems. The companies of our company located in Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia are gradually adopting such systems, with HaliTech and Zhejiang Zhongkong’s SIS solutions being used in most cases, and the overall results are quite good.
I had never heard of SIS in dry power plants before
Calcium carbide plant... what is there to protect?
Sis is still the dark horse; Kangjisen is a bit better
SIS – it probably isn’t very useful. If it were useful, why would the plant still explode in Yangshui? Could it be that the Japanese invaders have come again to attack, dropping a bomb on Xiangshui? .
It’s not very useful; it’s just a waste of money.
The question is whether it is being used and whether it can be used; I guess the SIS systems in use are actually non-compliant. Most companies are established out of necessity to cope with inspections. Plus, there are so many certified companies in the country at the moment... The outcome is predictable
Systems related to safety such as SIS and ESD are highly necessary, but whether enterprises or production facilities actually deploy them and use them correctly is a question. This is actually a management issue, as well as a matter related to the quantitative assessment of security costs. Without a safety system, an accident might not occur for ten years; with a safety system but if it isn’t used properly, an accident might still not occur for ten years. But an accident is enough to cause a lot of trouble.
We’re ready to go too; DM the original poster!
SIS, an automatically operating closed-loop system – what isn’t there to use? What’s not good about it? ,,,,, It’s all nonsense. .
Let me tell you, SIS is really useful,,, but it doesn’t necessarily work in all cases. Do you understand? .