Thread Content
Which type is good for high-temperature and high-pressure oil-water level gauges? Currently, electric floats are used, but coking of the float can lead to inaccurate measurements
Radar interface meter, high precision, contactless
It is recommended to choose magnetostrictive sensors; the magnetostrictive sensors currently used for interface measurement are the best option. They are of the contact type, enabling real-time feedback on the liquid level at the interface, as well as allowing for the simultaneous measurement of both the interface and the liquid surface.
RF admittance-based; all electrodialysis tanks use RF admittance. Agent 18302250530
This post was last edited by Ybaci on 2019-7-25 at 16:16. FOXBORO imported high-pressure float level gauges (capable of measuring interface density); the torque rod measurement method provides an accuracy of 0.2% (the highest in the industry). Contact number: 18340813050, Wu Gong
I was originally using 244LD; the performance gets worse as time goes by. Is it now possible to measure density online?
A mixed phase layer of coking and waxing – trying to measure the interface? It’s impossible to get an accurate reading; absolute nonsense! It’s nauseating, with all those false alarms. How should it be measured? Take a look at the post written by my brother: https://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-2754515-1-1.html
Based on the principles of measurement, the formation of coke deposits on the float will cause the instrument to fail to measure the buoyancy value accurately; how then can it determine the level value or the density value with precision? Just like an anal eater eating feces, that’s why the smell in a dog’s den is so foul {:2_42:}
Could the working condition description be more detailed?