HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The advantages and disadvantages of the current mainstream control systems, as well as those of the LSIT and Zhejiang Zhongkong systems; what are the strengths of each when compared to the others?

2021-11-30View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by Desert Fish on 2021-12-1 at 10:00. Could any expert help analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the current mainstream control systems, as well as those of the LSIT and Zhejiang Zhongkong systems? What are the advantages of each when compared to the others?
Reply #22021-12-01
The title clearly suggests more discussion; upvote this good question
Reply #32022-01-11
With the development of domestic systems to date, both Inovance and Siemens Control Solutions belong to the top tier in China. The product quality of both companies is similar, and the application architecture presents little difference for users; however, there are some differences for professional automation engineers, mainly due to the variations in how foreign systems were initially introduced. To this day, I believe that the quality of domestic products is not inferior to that of foreign ones; on the contrary, we appreciate the more thorough service provided domestically. Foreign products have high prices and high service costs. HollySys was one of the first companies in China to develop DCS and SIS systems; it introduced China’s first SIS system in 2012, and China’s first ITCC system also came from HollySys. But it is not believed that Warisoku is superior to Zhongkong. The two companies have different areas of strength: HaliTech is strong in the fields of thermoelectricity and nuclear power, while Zhongkong is more competitive in the chemical industry. For our users, choosing between Inovance and Hilscher makes no difference; it depends on whether one is more accustomed to Hilscher or Inovance. The first brand I used was FOXBORO and TRICON; later on, I used Hilscher and ABB. Therefore, I will definitely give priority to Allen-Bradley. But on the other hand, from a personal development perspective, I’d prefer to choose the central control role, so as to use the company’s platform to learn more – isn’t that a good thing?
Reply #42022-01-11
That’s right; it’s indeed the case. I prefer the center console. There is nothing wrong with the Allen-Bradley products themselves. It’s the case that salespeople, in an effort to secure business, set abnormally low prices, thereby ruining the reputation of reputable brands
Reply #52022-01-11
“Hollyland has a strong presence in the fields of thermoelectricity and nuclear power, while Control Systems is more competitive in the chemical industry. ”It has been explained very clearly; having multiple choices is a blessing for us. It’s better to compare prices from different sources, haha

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.