How is Zhejiang Zhongkong’s DCS in terms of formula management?

Zhejiang Zhongkong’s DCS performs well in formula management. Although the processes for fine chemical equipment are fixed, the processes and formulations often change, and the operating conditions are continuously adjusted. The sequential control program of Zhejiang Zhongkong is able to adapt well to such changes and achieve precise formula management. It features flexible configuration capabilities; users can adjust and modify the formulas as needed, and it allows for real-time monitoring and management of various operating conditions. Recipe management poses a challenge for any system, but Zhejiang Zhongkong’s DCS is able to handle complex recipe changes and operational adjustments efficiently thanks to its robust recipe management capabilities. Users can easily edit, import, and export recipe data, enabling quick switching and updating of recipes. At the same time, the system offers comprehensive functions such as formula review, version management, and permission control to ensure the security and accuracy of formula data. Compared to other foreign systems, Zhejiang Zhongkong’s DCS is no less effective in terms of formula management. It possesses independent intellectual property rights, and after years of development and optimization, it has been validated and applied in numerous projects. Therefore, it is fully capable of competing with foreign systems, and can even surpass them to become the preferred choice for process control in domestic fine chemical equipment. .

In which year did Zhejiang Zhongkong become mature in the field of fine chemicals? I remember that in the past, no one used it in the oil and petrochemical industries either; back then it seemed to be used only in some small projects, such as a few small distillation towers. Over the years, Zhejiang Zhongkong has become a significant player in the oil and petrochemical sector.

Maybe everyone has misunderstood; perhaps many people think this is an outright case of someone trying to promote their own product. That’s not true at all; I have no relationship with so-and-so. Our company uses a system from a major foreign brand; I don’t think it’s good – it doesn’t look pleasant, and I don’t see any outstanding features in terms of functionality. There are no particularly high requirements in terms of control systems either; they are quite ordinary, without any complex controls. There is almost no use of cascade control, nor are there any complicated interlocks. There are also no specific requirements regarding control speed. I think it’s completely unnecessary to use foreign brands – domestic options are just fine. It’s just that the old systems come with many pre-built sequence control programs and formula management features, so the managers insist on using the original foreign brands. I don’t think it’s necessary at all; using systems from well-known domestic manufacturers and recreating the sequence control programs isn’t a difficult task either.