How to improve the effective gas components in the Texaco gasifier output?
Thread Content
How to improve the effective gas components in the Texaco gasifier output? I thought there are the following methods: 1. Change the design of the burner to improve the atomization effect ； 2. Increase the concentration of water-coal slurry; this requires a dedicated discussion ； 3. Adjust the ratio of central oxygen ； 3. Adjust the furnace temperature to ensure operation at a low temperature while allowing liquid slag discharge. Gurus, do you think there are any other methods?
To put it directly, it means raising the reaction temperature, but only on the condition that the equipment and refractory bricks can withstand it. All the efforts are made to raise the reaction temperature in advance, by increasing the coal slurry concentration, the atomization effect, and so on
This post was last edited by Chemical Engineering*Beginner Class on 2019-4-4 18:02. Operating at a low furnace temperature does not necessarily improve the composition of the useful gases; an appropriate temperature for the coal is required. One more thing: the length of the burner should be appropriate.
The most effective way to increase the effective gas volume is to prolong the residence time of the gas in the furnace and adjust the atomization angle of the burner.
The most effective way to increase the effective gas volume is to prolong the residence time of the gas in the furnace and adjust the atomization angle of the burner.
Can operating at a lower furnace temperature increase the effective gas?
The most effective approach is to apply high loads or increase the slurry concentration to raise the pressure in the gasifier
First of all, it is best to be able to obtain high-quality coal, as the quality of coal plays a very important role. Coal with high calorific value and high fixed carbon content should also have good slurry-forming properties. Secondly, the operating temperature is kept low while ensuring liquid slag discharge, provided that the flow of ash and slag is good. The reduction of the slag hole must be supported by theoretical calculations.