Thread Content
Let’s talk about it: when company management is poor, those who are competent want to change jobs, while those who aren’t competent think about how to give gifts. How can such a company do well?
I think I’m quite capable, but I’m also thinking about how to give gifts. Which one is it? ;P
Having achievements to offer as gifts will help you progress faster; it’s better for your boss to notice your strengths rather than having to look for them on their own
Even competence and gifts can’t compare to a boss’s relatives through marriage……
I believe that once a leader accepts gifts, it becomes very difficult for them to act fairly and impartially, let alone be transparent. As a result, they can no longer manage with an unbiased attitude; over time, they tend to favor those who are related to them and suppress those they consider to be a threat, instead of evaluating each employee based on their skills and contributions. Such a person cannot be considered a competent manager. Such managers are extremely harmful to the development of the company.
It is not easy for managers to be fair, just, and transparent in the daily production process; if they manage to do so, they will certainly be popular managers, and the company will also thrive.
Wherever there are people, there is inequality; there is no absolute fairness. I think perhaps the original poster didn’t give any gifts and is a bit worried!
Whether it’s enterprises or **government agencies and public institutions, no matter how the disciplinary committees manage them, it remains a matter of character that is difficult to change
Do leaders still dare to accept bribes? **Anti-** is so powerful these days.