Thread Content
A new fan has been installed. Before conducting the trial run, the manufacturer prepared a trial run plan that requires approval by the management of Party A. Should the manufacturer take it to get the signature, or should the technical staff from Party A’s workshop go to get the approval?
Technicians, have the technicians review it to check if there are any issues
This post was last edited by CHANGBAISHI on 2019-11-14 at 16:05. The client’s equipment department should take the lead in organizing this task. As a technician, I go to sign things with the items in hand,,, There are many factors at play here, and they’re quite complex. If you sign, you’re essentially acting as a go-between for Party B, and that’s not acceptable:lol The correct approach is for the equipment supervisors of both parties to handle things on their own; it’s right not to get involved in matters between them.
It’s about the Equipment Department. Intervention by the process should not be appropriate
Organize a meeting at a specific time to discuss the matter, notify all relevant parties, go over the test plan, and have everyone sign off right after the meeting!
The manufacturer is responsible for carrying out the trial runs; certainly, their staff will go to get the supervisor’s approval. However, as a technical staff member in the client’s workshop, it is necessary to review the trial run plan before submitting it to the supervisor, so that the supervisor can have a more detailed understanding of the plan.
A few years of effort may not be as much as the day you met me. QQ: 212536445