In the modeling of a catalytic cracking fractionation tower, should the herringbone baffles be included in the total number of trays? What value is appropriate for the tray efficiency?

2020-02-23View Original

Thread Content

In the modeling of a catalytic cracking fractionation tower, should the herringbone baffles be included in the total number of trays? What value is appropriate for the tray efficiency? Thank you all!

Reply #22020-02-24

Hinge plates are not included in the actual count of plates. 0.6-0.7

Reply #32020-02-24

This post was last edited by *amingteda on 2020-2-24 10:01. Considering the overall efficiency of the tower, 50% is generally sufficient. Of course, it is related to factors such as the physical system and operating conditions.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

In the modeling of a catalytic cracking fractionation tower, should the herringbone baffles be included in the total number of trays? What value is appropriate for the tray efficiency?

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links