HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Blue Star POM Technology Assessment

2009-06-19View Original

Thread Content

Blue Star’s POM technology comes from **Fuyi Company**; although the production facilities were originally taken over from Formosa Plastics, the following aspects can be used to assess its performance: 1. Product quality: It is inevitable that there will be issues with quality in the early stages of production. After one year, BS90 has seen a rapid improvement in quality (regrettably, this conclusion was reached by domestic POM competitors). 2. Production volume: It has not been possible to achieve a production rate of 40 KT/Y; although the 72-hour test was passed, there are problems with maintaining continuous and stable production. 3. Energy consumption: It is relatively high (specific figures cannot be disclosed, but it is more than half lower compared to the closed-loop melting process used by Jilin POM). 4. Environmental impact assessment: The assessment results are poor; it’s unclear how it managed to pass this evaluation. Many people have discussed the quality of Fuyi’s polyoxymethylene production process. As for the production techniques themselves, there are no issues; the problem lies with those responsible for production – whether they have mastered the techniques involved in producing POM and whether they have the ability and willingness to improve quality
Reply #22009-06-19
Regardless of whether it is M90, BS090, F2003, or M9044, as long as it is polyoxymethylene, its physical properties are more or less similar. The difference between Lanxing’s BS090 and those from abroad lies in the formulation; this is what leads to significant differences in the defects of the polyoxymethylene products compared to those made abroad, such as in terms of thermal stability. As for the production process, what people care about are the material consumption and the stability of quality. Therefore, after a year of production, Lanxing has only managed to become familiar with the polyoxymethylene production process, and there is no substantial difference in product quality. Hehe, there’s still a long way to go. But it’s okay; at least Blue Planet is a pioneer
Reply #32009-07-28
The problem isn’t with those who are involved in production, at least not a major one (are there no problems, more or less, with those who work in production there?) ) The problem also lies in... the quality of Blue Star products is really not satisfactory!
Reply #42009-07-30
Could someone upstairs talk about the quality difference between Blue Star and other manufacturers?
Reply #52009-07-30
Does anyone have a brief introduction to the techniques of Fuyi Company? We won’t insist on keeping things confidential; it’s fine to share the basic process.
Reply #62009-08-09
There are problems on both sides. One is management, and the other is technology. The problem with the process is the route issue.
Reply #72009-08-21
Agree with the person above. In terms of the manufacturing process, I think it comes down to the determination and optimization of the parameters at various control points.
Reply #82009-08-29
At present, the polyoxymethylene project is somewhat reckless

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.