The rights have arrived
Thread Content
Do anyone have any good suggestions regarding the penalty items for instrumentation contractors in construction projects? In other words, from which aspects should the fines imposed on them be derived? It’s only related to the instrumentation field.
The wiring is aesthetically pleasing, the construction quality is good, and there are few errors; these issues can be identified through the three inspections and four confirmations； Safety is always the best way to impose fines; you can catch them as many times as you want ； Whether the materials purchased by the construction contractor meet the standards ； The construction standards for work in the factory are given to them in advance; if there are issues with hammering or similar tasks, it’s basically not possible to impose any fines, so it’s difficult to take action.
Give me some specific details, man. It’s my first time working on a project of this scale. The boss said to start by preparing some clauses related to instruments and displays, but I don’t know where to begin. . .
Haha, as long as it’s compliant with the law, it can’t be considered abuse of power, right? (*^__^*) Hehe……
Generally, it is necessary to refer to standard contract templates; not only is it uncertain whether the parties can reach an agreement on the rules set by oneself, but missing items can also cause problems for one’s own side. It’s still best to sit down and talk things through amicably. Generally, a certain percentage of error rate is allowed, while some critical measurement points are set to ensure a higher quality standard and allow no errors. Other conventional aspects, such as which specific reference atlases should be used for installation, what level of accuracy the instruments should have, and the basic principles for layout, also need to be explained.
Determining the appropriate level of strictness is a technical task. As you know, the instrumentation field isn’t considered a ‘key discipline’ in the entire project. If you are too strict, progress will slow down and there will be many rework tasks, which affects the overall timeline and leaves the boss dissatisfied. On the other hand, if you set the standards too loosely, you’ll face difficulties in terms of supervision responsibility should problems arise in the future. Furthermore, there are too many clauses; during audits, questions will be raised as to whether all these clauses have been implemented one by one, where the various confirmation documents are located, and whether strict checks were carried out on these provisions when settling payments to the construction party based on their progress There are plenty of troublesome things.
When the three checks and four fixes are not followed, problems arise
Refer to the contract you signed; it is the terms of that contract that prevail. Plus company rules and regulations
If you approach it safely, you can punish however you want :lol
Finding a good construction team is far more useful than penalty clauses. Fines are the worst possible option; they are uncomfortable and ineffective