HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Worker in Zibo Zhoucun dies from electric shock in workshop; two public officials found guilty of dereliction of duty

2015-06-15View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by Yimi Lanhuazhi on June 15, 2015, at 11:04. The responsibility for work safety is of paramount importance; it cannot be emphasized enough. However, this in no way means that responsibilities can be arbitrarily assigned, nor that individuals bearing statutory duties should be made to assume additional, unlimited responsibilities. When Wang and Liu went to an enterprise in Zhoucun to conduct a safety inspection as required, they found no electrical hazards at the enterprise. Two months after the security inspection, a worker at this company in Zhoucun died from an electric shock in the workshop. Reporters learned today that the Zibo Intermediate People’s Court issued a final judgment, determining that Wang and Liu’s actions constituted the crime of dereliction of duty; as a result, they were exempted from criminal punishment for this offense.   On July 21, 2012, an electric shock accident occurred in the production workshop of a company in Zhoucun District. Employee Wang was electrocuted to death when his body came into contact with the exterior of a mixing machine while using it to mix plastic pellets. It was determined that the direct cause of the accident was the long-term erosion and aging of the motor lead connections in the mixing machine due to dripping lubricant, which resulted in the casing becoming electrified. The indirect causes are that the company fabricated records of safety training and education, failed to conduct thorough inspections for potential hazards in production safety, consistently used 63A relay protectors in place of 10A ones, and did not have full-time electricians assigned to the power distribution room.   It is understood that Liu is a clerk at the Office for Work Safety Supervision and Management, while Wang is a staff member of the Inspection Team of the Work Safety Supervision and Management Bureau. On May 28, 2012, Wang and Liu went to this enterprise in Zhoucun to conduct a safety inspection, focusing on whether there were any potential hazards in the safety production documents. Circuit safety aspects such as the need for relay protectors and large electrical equipment to be grounded were also part of the inspection scope. However, during their inspection of the company, Wang and Liu failed to detect or address these long-standing safety hazards.   In October 2014, the People’s Court of Zhoucun District rendered a first-instance judgment: The defendants Wang and Liu, as officials of **, failed to fulfill their duties properly in the course of their work, resulting in significant losses to the interests of ** and the people; their actions constituted the crime of dereliction of duty. The defendants Wang and Liu committed relatively minor crimes; considering the circumstances of this case, they may both be exempted from criminal punishment in accordance with the law. The defendant, Liu, disagreed and filed an appeal.   Today, reporters learned from the Zibo Intermediate People’s Court that, after examination, Liu, as a person performing official duties in accordance with the law, failed to identify potential hazards such as electrical safety issues during law enforcement inspections of the enterprise, resulting in a safety accident there; his actions met the criteria for the crime of dereliction of duty. Liu and Wang’s actions constitute the crime of dereliction of duty.   Based on this, the Intermediate People’s Court of Zibo rejected Liu’s appeal and upheld the original judgment. What do you think of this? Any ideas? How do you feel right now? ! What would you do? What will you do in the future? ! It’s right here beside me! !
Reply #22015-06-15
Can the company inform the inspectors about the replacement of the relay protector?
Reply #32015-06-15
Will they go to jail for neglecting their duties, or will it just be a fine?
Reply #42015-06-15
Final judgment: exemption from criminal punishment: handshake
Reply #52015-06-15
It’s understandable that the staff in the inspection team of the Work Safety Supervision and Administration Bureau may not possess the skills needed for safety inspections – after all, **many inspectors use inspections as an excuse to find faults, yet their own safety skills are insufficient, so it’s natural they can’t identify potential hazards. Thankfully, I’m not one of those staff members;P
Reply #62015-06-16
If you are a safety manager in a company and such an accident occurs in your company, the company bears primary responsibility. As a safety manager, what penalties should be imposed? Then, even as a security manager in a company who conducts daily on-site inspections, can you detect such potential hazards?
Reply #72015-06-18
**Inspectors cannot identify all of a company’s problems and potential risks. Enterprises bear primary responsibility.
Reply #82015-06-18
Now, safety managers should be viewed as versatile professionals. . .
Reply #92015-06-18
Are there no temporary workers left? ! ! !
Reply #102015-06-18
It’s very burdensome; as a manager, I’m also at a loss. Safety managers must possess safety skills and knowledge, and they need to keep learning and improving. But it’s not a panacea either; it’s not an encyclopedia and can’t solve all problems. That’s why I mentioned in the forum last time that the pressure on registered safety engineers has increased, as legal representatives no longer need a safety management certificate. Became the primary person responsible.
Reply #112015-06-19
Even temporary workers don’t dare to go there: lol

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.