HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Common mistakes in writing professional title papers

2015-07-17View Original

Thread Content

What aspects should be considered when writing a thesis, and how can one write a high-quality thesis for professional advancement? Here are some suggestions for you: 1. The logic of the article. Many authors make some logical errors when writing articles, which are a major taboo in paper writing. These errors manifest themselves as follows: (1) The content does not relate to the topic; the argument is presented in the earlier parts of the text, but when it is explained later on, it turns out that what is explained does not align with that argument – they are two different things. Overall, there is a mismatch between the article title and the content ; (2) The arguments in the article are not sufficient to warrant a lengthy discussion. The author put forward an argument earlier, which is discussed in the following text. However, this argument is merely a phenomenon; the author fails to turn this phenomenon into an actual argument. As a result, the article becomes a mere list of phenomena, and such a list is superficial and not sufficient to serve as an argument. 2. Objectivity of the article. Regarding the overall tone of the article, the author should strive to use an objective tone at all times while writing, and avoid using the first person frequently, such as \"I\", \"I think\", \"I believe\", and so on. It is entirely possible to use “the author” and “the author believes”. 3. The structure of the article. Some authors, when writing articles, produce texts of several thousand words in which there are no sections or headings at all, from beginning to end. This gives the impression that the article lacks clarity in its structure and is chaotic. When writing an article, the author must present the content in bullet points: provide a brief introduction at the beginning, and then use bullets 1, 2, 3 to elaborate. This makes it clear at a glance.
Reply #22015-07-19
Two more key points: first, do not copy entirely from technical books; second, it must be combined with work performance. I have served as an intermediate judge and have some experience in that.
Reply #32015-09-11
It would be best if the paper includes reflections on one’s own work

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.