HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Steam pipe support issue 2

2015-08-26View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by yudeguoshi on 2015-8-27 at 10:37. For a steam pipeline with a pressure of 2.4 MPa, a temperature of 400 degrees Celsius, and a DN200 diameter, what is an appropriate distance between the two fixed supports? Can a pi-shaped compensator be used? If a compensator is to be used, which one would be suitable?
Reply #22015-08-27
What is the pipe diameter? Determine the total straight length of the pipeline, and then decide how many π-shaped compensators are needed based on that total length; of course, this also depends on the size of the π-shaped compensators.
Reply #32015-09-11
For expansion bend compensation, 50-60 meters is generally appropriate.
Reply #42016-11-07
It’s better to use pattern compensation for the layout; this allows for the calculation of the expansion amount, that is, the slip amount. The slip amount should not be too large – generally, it should not exceed 100. The supports need to be extended to prevent slipping
Reply #52016-11-08
Pipeline stress management is precisely for this purpose; it’s not enough to only consider the spacing between fixed supports. The possibility of achieving a one-time successful installation is relatively low. Repeated adjustments to the design of the supports is generally inevitable, although in cases where the quality of work is high, the chance of a one-time successful installation increases.
Reply #62016-11-21
Not more than one hundred; it’s really hard to keep it at that level
Reply #72016-11-21
It’s not so much a matter of difficulty; under normal conditions, this can be achieved by using a design with appropriate tension bending. However, sometimes process engineers are pressured by cost considerations and are forced to adopt a design with a large degree of expansion
Reply #82016-11-21
For example, the expansion amount on the third floor isn’t very large; if you don’t believe it, just do the calculations
Reply #92016-11-21
Well, I know that it’s possible to keep it under 100, but the π-bend will be very close; especially with high-pressure steam. For medium-pressure steam, the value is also around 150 or higher.
Reply #102016-11-21
50-60 meters of medium-pressure steam should be able to do it within 100, but high-pressure steam definitely can’t, haha
Reply #112016-11-22
Since I work in project management, from a cost perspective, I recommend using large π compensators. The use of such compensators is feasible provided that the site conditions permit it; if space is limited, several compensators can be installed to absorb thermal displacement. Moreover, from the standpoint of saving space, it is more advantageous to use π compensators in road designs.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.