Thread Content
During the production process in various factories, various production-related calculations and assessments are carried out on a daily basis. Calculate various metrics such as the amount of material used, output volume, qualification rate, fermentation efficiency, distillation efficiency, and other assessment figures. If the assessment data deviates significantly from the normal values, there may also be economic rewards or penalties. Once, I was debugging equipment at the user’s factory. One day, I worked late, and the workshop supervisor accompanied me out for dinner. As we drank and chatted, I began to have a heart-to-heart conversation with the workshop supervisor. We talked about workshop management and production evaluation. After enjoying the wine, the workshop supervisor brought out his ultimate trick. The director said that in his place, there will never be a problem of insufficient production efficiency, not even in ten thousand years! The director said mysteriously that he could take the finished product from the large container and transfer it back to the small containers in his own workshop. ;Who is Director Wang of Workshop P? ? I’ll never tell, even if you kill me! ;P The phenomenon mentioned by the director does indeed exist! Sea friends, what do you think? ?
He can take the finished products that are in the large containers and transfer them back to the small containers in his workshop, where they can be locked up. .
I don’t understand what that means Does that mean fraud? ;P Is he supposed to take care of both the warehouse and the workshop by himself? Why aren’t the finished products stored in the warehouse! Or is the finished can located inside the workshop?
There is also the issue of yield; a rough yield is determined first, and then calculations are done backwards based on that.
What's going on? Is it the Way, yet not the Way? Or is it theft, yet not theft?
The company will definitely discover it during the inventory check; this director probably won’t be able to keep his job much longer! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
1: Bluffing. 2: Imperfect corporate systems and poor on-site management. 3: Are there any safety risks in doing this?
Actually, it’s also possible to use future resources to cover present needs:victory:
This situation did indeed exist N years ago
Sacrificing the many for the few is a phenomenon that is all too common.