HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Thoughts on the Pressure Vessel Training, Assessment, Review, and Defense Session – First Session in 2015 (Kunming)

2015-10-11View Original

Thread Content

In July 2015, I attended the drawing review defense in Kunming (the first exam was held in Changsha, and I passed the theoretical test). The LPG storage tank drawings reviewed in Kunming in July were quite simple, but contained many errors (weld coefficient, inspection ratio, heat treatment, hydrostatic testing, under-welding, fitting impact, flange gaskets, ducts; I can’t remember the others). The experts’ questions were relatively simple; I also noted the questions from other candidates: the selection of the weld coefficient ; Allowable stress of stainless steel ; Stress of the tube sheet ; The purpose of tube box heat treatment ; The principle of high-pressure sealing ; Difference between fixed and insertable catheters ; Why is it necessary to verify the saddle? ; Several stresses in horizontal containers ; Why is the pressure rating of pipe flanges higher than that of manholes? ; Stress calculation for fixed tube sheets ; Issues to consider in the design, manufacturing, and welding of stress-corrosion media, as well as the critical sections of cone shells. Personally, I feel that taking the A2 exam is more difficult than taking the A1, A2, and A3 exams. Since A2 is likely to involve heat exchangers, many candidates fail the exam related to heat exchangers. A1 has a limited variety of container devices, and its errors are quite obvious. I know that those who took the A1 and A2 exams all passed. In the first class held in Kunming, many standards had just been updated; perhaps due to time constraints, the Standards Committee prepared fewer types of drawings. There are fewer applicants for the Kunming class, so the examination environment is better, while there are more people in the Changsha class. I’m not sure how the pass rate is controlled; could the pass rate for the Kunming class be higher? (This remains to be determined.) If possible, go to Kunming to take the exam; the climate there is pleasant and it’s also a great place for tourism. Be honest with the experts during the defense – admit what you know and what you don’t. Professionals also know that the work done by candidates is usually quite limited, and they don’t cover everything. There’s one more important thing: bring a calculator to the exam. Bring a calculator, bring a calculator – I repeat this important point three times. During my exam, I encountered two candidates who didn’t bring one. The above are all my personal opinions; please forgive any mistakes!
Reply #22015-10-11
Thank you very much to the original poster for sharing their experience so generously; wish you success!
Reply #32015-10-11
The experience shared by the original poster is very important. Nowadays, theoretical exams in these tests no longer involve closed-book testing, which reduces the difficulty level; however, the difficulty of drawing diagrams during the defense phase has increased. Wish the original poster success in their defense.
Reply #42015-10-11
I would like to ask why the pressure rating of pipe flanges is higher than that of manholes? :lol:lol
Reply #52015-10-12
With a calculator, thanks for sharing~:)
Reply #62015-10-12
Oh no, there isn’t much I can answer! :o
Reply #72015-10-12
The training in Kunming offers great accommodation, meals, and classes; one can also take walks or read books at the training center when there’s nothing to do – really great.
Reply #82015-10-12
My experience is: look at more diagrams, consult standards more often, and search on Shanghai Chuan. The knowledge related to pressure vessels is quite classical; many old materials provide clear explanations for various issues, so it’s worth looking for relevant books and articles. One can thoroughly study all the drawings that the company has designed, manufactured, and for which quotes have been submitted. By carefully understanding the basis behind each technical requirement and the reasons behind the determination of each technical parameter, it is definitely possible to succeed.
Reply #92015-10-12
OP, is the training manual you’re using still the \"Training Manual for Pressure Vessel Design Engineers\" published in October 2005?
Reply #102015-10-12
Yes, the textbook hasn’t changed. Moreover, it’s a classic textbook with comprehensive content; I think it’s quite good.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.