Thread Content
The loss rate in catalytic processing is high; what measures can be taken to reduce this loss rate?
What’s the figure over there? Here, we calculate energy consumption based on 0.25. Also, is your processing loss calculated based on actual values, or are design values used instead?
1. Check the flare valve; 0 emissions. 2. Optimize the operation of the stripping section. 3. Check for leaks, spills, drips, and seepages.
How did you calculate it?
We don’t do calculations; we follow the design data provided
Who else has any better ideas and suggestions on reducing processing loss rates
0.25 is quite low; can burning be measured accurately?
The machining loss rate of the device is usually based on the machining loss specified in the design documents. Due to the accuracy of the instruments and the precision of the burning calculations, it is usually not possible to determine an exact loss rate. We calculate it at 0.4%
What factors affect processing losses?
Who can clearly explain the processing losses: raw material – product – charring = loss. There is measurement of the raw material, measurement of the product, calculation of charring, and calculation of losses. In fact, both charring and losses represent errors; when the losses are high, the amount of charring is low. The leaks at the static sealing points in the equipment are all minor in quantity. Taking a plant with a capacity of 150 tons per hour as an example, a 0.25% loss results in 9 tons lost per day, while a 0.4% loss results in 14.4 tons lost per day – that’s quite a significant amount.