This post was last edited by TH373637 on 11-10-2015 at 15:02. Table 1: A brief comparison of low-pressure methanol synthesis reactors. Type: SPC, ICI, cold-quench, Lurgi, shell-and-tube, Linde, spiral, MRF, Linde, JW. Catalyst layer temperature difference: small, large, small, small, large. Catalyst production intensity: highest, large, large, large, large. Cycle ratio: smallest, large, large, large, smaller. Catalyst lifespan: longest, longer, long, short, short. Highest one-pass conversion rate: highest, lowest, high, low, low, low. Structural reliability: very good, good, poor, fair, poor, good. Ease of scale-up: easy, easy, difficult, difficult, easy. Recovery of heat and by-product steam: none or low pressure, medium pressure, medium pressure, medium pressure, low pressure. Process rationality: simple, simple, reasonable, simple, simple, reasonable. Operating rate (stability): highest, lowest, higher, higher. Presence of large-scale operating plants (400,000 tons/year or more): yes, no, yes, no, yes, no
Luchi synthesis towers account for 50-60% of the market share, and their production capacity makes up 70% of the total. In terms of functionality, these towers integrate the reactor, waste heat exchangers, and heaters into one unit; they are easy to operate, allow for smooth start-up and shutdown processes, ensure uniform catalyst reduction, and thus guarantee stable performance from both the synthesis tower and the associated equipment. It’s hard to put it succinctly to summarize these things.