HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

How is the safety barrier powered?

2015-11-23View Original

Thread Content

For safety barriers in DCS system cabinets, is bottom-mounted power supply better or rail-mounted power supply better? What are their respective advantages and disadvantages? Including cost, failure rate, and so on. I’ve noticed that some design institutes choose between baseplate-based or rail-based power supply methods depending on the type of signal, such as whether it’s a control-related circuit or just an indication circuit; they use different approaches for each case. What is the reason for this?
Reply #22015-11-23
The bottom-plate type of safety barrier looks much better; the bottom plate is powered centrally, while the guide rails are powered separately. The bottom plate is clearly more attractive, though its cost is higher. If cost is not a concern, then the bottom-plate type is the better choice. This applies mainly to several series from MTL and P+F

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.