How could the process package be made such a poor quality?
Thread Content
Why did our design institute choose such a poor-quality process package, full of errors, contradictions, and unclear statements? Are process packages usually written in such a rough and inadequate manner? Sure, process packages are all written by many professionals from research institutions, right?
This post was last edited by *nht1 on 2015-12-5 at 11:15. They are all templates, many of them created by new college students or in collaboration with universities. These days, only speed matters, not efficiency; the managers are also distracted, focusing only on returns from projects and ignoring such things. Which professional would go through the trouble of writing them manually? In a feasible report I saw yesterday, the estimated cost for an office computer was 10,000 per unit; I think 3,000 is sufficient, at most 5,000. I’ll give one well-known example – no need to say more. Those who prepare these reports are all registered consultants; it’s hilarious. A machine that can only take exams.
The depth of the process package can refer to SHSG-052-2003–\"Requirements for the Content of Process Design Packages for Petrochemical Plants\"; if the requirements are not met, the supplier can be requested to make corrections.
The 2nd and 3rd floors have a bit of a messy atmosphere; especially on the 3rd floor. Can templates be used for preparing the construction packages? Can a registered consultant come up with it? What you're referring to might be a feasibility study.
I took a look; this is just a standard used internally by Sinopec, and it can serve as a reference. I’m not sure if there are any mandatory national or industry standards Must there be a dedicated section on fire protection in the process package? At the process package review meeting, our vice president requested that the preparer of the process package add a dedicated section on fire protection
The process packages developed by research institutes and universities are also rather rudimentary, lacking in depth, and they also lack engineering experience.
The fire protection section refers to the basic fire protection equipment that is determined during the initial design phase based on the characteristics and scale of your materials as well as their layout; it has nothing to do with the process package. What’s most important in a process package are the three types of balance, the basic processes, the standards for operation, inspection, and quality control, and economic analysis