Regarding the wall thickness issue for 200 small-diameter pipes under custody
Thread Content
For several projects, we have been plagued by one problem: we used Dianguan 87 in the past, and now we want to switch to Dianguan 2000. However, we found that the difference between the two standards lies in terms of small-diameter pipes – the wall thickness of Dianguan 2000 is much thinner than that of Dianguan 87, which makes us feel uneasy. As a result, we are forced to use Dianguan 87 again. We’re struggling back and forth between these two standards. I wonder if anyone else has encountered this issue; what are your thoughts? And how was it handled?
I heard about escrow for the first time. . I can’t understand it at all.
I work with electrically marked elbows. Although the thickness is reduced according to the 2000 standard, there isn’t much change in the materials used in practice
I work with electrically marked elbows. Although the thickness is reduced according to the 2000 standard, there isn’t much change in the materials used in practice