Recommended standards and mandatory standards
Thread Content
Today I encountered a question regarding the implementation of voluntary standards. At my previous employer, it was believed that voluntary standards are not mandatory; such standards do not have any compulsory character, and any organization is free to decide whether to adopt them. Violating such standards does not result in any economic or legal consequences. ) The parentheses contain the explanation from the encyclopedia, which I quite agree with. This new unit is considered a recommended standard; once adopted, it becomes mandatory. For example, is 151 mandatory or optional?
Has anyone mentioned how it’s implemented where you are?
**Standards and industry standards are divided into mandatory standards and recommended standards. Standards that ensure human health, as well as the safety of persons and property, and those mandated for enforcement by laws and administrative regulations are mandatory standards; other standards are recommended standards. Mandatory standards must be followed. Products that do not meet mandatory standards are prohibited from being produced, sold, or imported. Recommended standards, **encouraging enterprises to adopt them voluntarily. Once a technical standard is referenced in a security technical specification, the referenced portion becomes mandatory. Classifying standards into mandatory and recommended standards is a characteristic of China; the common practice in countries around the world is that all standards are recommended.
How should this introduction section be defined? If it does not meet the citation standards, should it be stated that no citation standards were used? Is that reasonable?
Standards of a recommendatory nature are not mandatory; any organization has the right to decide whether to adopt them, and violating such standards does not entail any economic or legal consequences. According to this, it seems like T has been artificially strengthened
/With T as the recommendation standard, citation is mandatory. . .
It’s simple: you don’t have to cite it, but once you do, you must carry it out
Today I encountered a question regarding the implementation of voluntary standards. At my previous employer, it was believed that voluntary standards are not mandatory; such standards do not have any compulsory character, and any organization is free to decide whether to adopt them. Violating such standards does not result in any economic or legal consequences. ) The parentheses contain the explanation from the encyclopedia, which I quite agree with. This new unit is considered a recommended standard; once adopted, it becomes mandatory. For example, is 151 mandatory or optional? The understanding of the above-mentioned individuals is correct. If there is no “/T” after the standard number, it is a mandatory standard that must be implemented without exception ； If there is “/T” after the standard number, it is a recommended standard. **The use of recommended standards is encouraged; enterprises can freely choose between mandatory standards and recommended standards. Once a recommended standard is chosen, it must be strictly followed during the manufacturing process.
They are all recommended; can I not cite any of them? Then it won’t get chaotic