HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

【Daily Question】1.23 Electrochemical protection of hydrogen embrittlement-sensitive materials (3 wealth points for a reply; +3 to +8 wealth points for a correct answer)

2016-01-23View Original

Thread Content

Question: True or False: Materials sensitive to hydrogen embrittlement cannot be protected by cathodic protection ( ). Regarding the requirements for answering the questions and the hints: Please answer carefully. Hint: You can guess if you’re unsure. Note that we will close this thread after 24 hours, during which time we will announce the best response (the most helpful one), as well as the answers and explanations. Other details: Recruitment for moderators & technicians in the [Mechanical Section] – applications and referrals are welcome. 【Valid indefinitely】【If you’re interested, come ahead!】 】(Click to enter) 【Mechanical Zone】Comprehensive guide to preventing equipment freezing over during winter 【Mechanical Zone】Call for collection of essential knowledge 【Seeking manufacturer sponsors】(Ongoing campaign) Rewards for recommending valuable content; the “Most Active Users and Weekly Stars” competition in the Mechanical Zone has begun. Wealth, metals, corrosion, zones, machinery
Reply #22016-01-23
Materials sensitive to hydrogen embrittlement cannot be protected by cathodic protection (True).
Reply #32016-01-23
Materials sensitive to hydrogen embrittlement cannot be protected by cathodic protection (True).
Reply #42016-01-23
Materials sensitive to hydrogen embrittlement cannot be protected by cathodic protection (True).
Reply #52016-01-23
Materials sensitive to hydrogen embrittlement cannot be protected by cathodic protection (True)
Reply #62016-01-23
Correct – (1) First of all, the direction is incorrect. Due to the decrease in solubility, during the cooling process after forging, the positive hydrogen ions in steel gain electrons and turn into hydrogen gas, which then accumulates within the material, leading to hydrogen embrittlement. From an electrochemical perspective, the release of hydrogen is a reduction process. Cathodic protection addresses the issues related to oxidation processes; it merely accelerates the release of hydrogen and does not solve the underlying problem. (2) Cathodic protection deals with problems on the surface of materials that are immersed in an electrolyte, whereas hydrogen embrittlement occurs as defects within the material itself. Hydrogen gas near the surface of the material can easily diffuse out, so there is generally no issue of hydrogen embrittlement at the surface. Therefore, even if this method were effective, it would likely be ineffective in dealing with this problem.
Reply #72016-01-23
That’s right; cathodic protection cannot be used

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.