Case analysis: Should the following situation be classified as a work-related injury? (2)
Thread Content
This post was last edited by slll611 on 2016-3-4 at 12:07. Work-related injuries need to be recognized by the human resources and social security authorities; only those confirmed as work-related injuries can qualify for the corresponding benefits. Therefore, work-related injury recognition is crucial for employees. Due to the diversity and complexity of real life, many work-related injury cases with similar yet distinct characteristics have emerged in the practice of determining such injuries. To this end, several such cases will be selected for discussion below to help establish a clear definition of work-related injuries; the results will be announced in one week. Everyone is welcome to participate in the debate; all participants will receive a reward, with extra prizes for those who can offer unique perspectives and detailed explanations. @zxz017 @LVZBMAN @hnan @wamj6566 @*anpangpang @hanyu*a8 @No Regrets @Storage and Transportation Torch @Guan Gongyu @yu3606 @*aojiaoya0546 @Fish in the Desert @B0SS @Linlin Shangshang @Sulfur Zinc Aluminum @Ice Age Snow Tracing @soul_BOY_young @zxj5048386 @Liu Fei @Recalling the Three Kingdoms liu. Case details: The injured person, Mr. Ou, was a security guard for a property management company. On August 16 last year, after work, he was riding his motorcycle on his way to Jihua Bridge when he noticed a van parked there on fire at the entrance of a company’s exhibition hall. He called the security manager and then went to the security room to get a fire extinguisher in order to put out the fire. Since the vehicle was burning from the inside, the fire extinguisher couldn’t extinguish the flames from the outside. Even after breaking the window glass and using a water gun, it wasn’t possible to completely put out the fire inside the vehicle. He reached in through the window to open the door so that other security guards could extinguish the remaining flames; as a result, his right hand was cut by the window glass, resulting in a laceration to his right ring finger. Later, his injuries sustained while fighting the fire were recognized as acts of bravery, but the property management company in question refused to acknowledge those injuries as work-related. Do you think it should be classified as a work-related injury? Don’t forget to reply after voting, otherwise you won’t get the reward. For evaluation criteria, refer to: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1556795-1-1.html
Injuries sustained while engaged in activities aimed at protecting safety, society, and the public interest, such as rescue operations, disaster relief, and saving lives, can also be recognized as work-related injuries. ,
Incidents that occur on the way to and from work are also considered work-related injuries: lol
The commute to and from work should be considered work-related injury, especially since it was an act of bravery
Injuries that occur on the way to and from work, and at places that are necessary for traveling to and from work, should be recognized as work-related injuries. In this case, even if the destination is not a necessary route for commuting, such acts of bravery should still be considered work-related injuries; only in this way can we better encourage excellence and promote positive values...
The commute to and from work should be considered an occupational injury, especially since it was an act of bravery
Acting bravely for a just cause is different from work-related injuries
Acting bravely for a just cause is different from work-related injuries
Acting bravely on the way home from work should be considered a work-related injury
Whether it counts as a work-related injury depends on whether he was on his way home from work. If it occurs during the latter half of the period, it should be considered an occupational injury ； If it wasn’t during the commute home, but only after work, it should not be considered a work-related injury.