HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

For S31603 submerged arc welding, which flux is suitable: HJ260 or SJ601?

2016-03-05View Original

Thread Content

For S31603 submerged arc welding, which flux is suitable: HJ260 or SJ601?
Reply #22016-03-05
For welding in a factory, sintered flux actually seems to be better
Reply #32016-03-05
For welding in a factory, sintered flux actually seems to be better
Reply #42016-03-06
Either one will work; the deslagging performance of HJ260 is slightly worse.
Reply #52016-03-07
The standard recommends SJ601 for S31603, but our company usually uses HJ260. In terms of performance, SJ601 is likely to be slightly better than HJ260 for welding ultra-low carbon stainless steel, as it can replenish Cr elements, whereas HJ260 causes some loss of Cr elements.
Reply #62016-03-07
In my opinion, SJ601 is a better choice; I’m not sure what others’ experiences are

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.