【Process and System Design Section】 Discussion on Adding a “Prefix” to the Topic
Thread Content
Forum guidelines: Regional leaders and moderators are requested to determine the prefix classification names for each forum on their own. By default, the first classification name should be the name of the forum’s specialty; the second one should be “Resource Sharing”. For the remaining prefixes, each forum should assign them according to the content related to its specialty. Once these have been determined, inform the moderators to make the necessary settings (keep the number of prefixes per forum at 10 or less). These prefixes are applicable only to heavily revised topics or newly created threads. Please have the moderators in charge of each section work together with the technical team members of that section to come up with some prefix names for those sections; these prefixes will then be set available for use when posting messages. Responsible persons for each section: The following section deputy moderators are in charge: For the Process section: @HuiXiong; for the Theory section: @ZaiHuiKangQiao; for the Piping and Valves section: @Sammy_Wang; for the CAD section: @HengShanPoXia. The following section deputy moderator, @flute6, is in charge of the PROII and ASPEN sections: @longkui1990, and of the Stress section: @GuangHuiXianZai. For the sections related to software sharing, both @jlwuli and the aforementioned deputy moderators are responsible for compiling the discussion contents from their respective sections and submitting them as replies to this post by the end of this week. For reference, see the categorized discussions in the Petrochemical section: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1573975-1-1.html
Is my understanding correct: Process resource preliminary feasibility study, process resources, process resource systems, process resource safety and environment aspects, process resource layout, process resource piping, other process resources ----------------------------------------------------- My consideration is that the materials and stresses related to piping will be discussed in two separate sections. Therefore, the main process specialties and piping specialties are listed here (excluding storage and transportation, water supply and drainage, stress, and materials). Add another preliminary feasibility study for the classification of initial data. I don’t know if my understanding is correct? Let’s discuss it in this session.
How about breaking it down more finely? CAD software and plugins, CAD tutorials, discussions on CAD-related issues, CAD drawings, PDSOFT software, PDSOFT tutorials, discussions on PDSOFT-related issues, PDMS software, PDMS tutorials, discussions on PDMS-related issues, PDS software, PDS tutorials, discussions on PDS-related issues, SmartPlant software, SmartPlant tutorials, discussions on SmartPlant-related issues, Cadworx software, Cadworx tutorials, discussions on Cadworx-related issues. Other 3D drawing software. @goldliyang @lijintao12153 @qxx*aoao What do you think: handshake
The prefixes seem too detailed and complex; they could be made a bit simpler. All resources should be placed in a single resource post without any further adjustments, with that post divided into categories for design drawings and software & plugin resources
This post was last edited by *lihuagong on 2016-3-22 at 13:54. I also think it’s not necessary to make such detailed classifications; considering that people need to choose when posting, it’s better to divide them into a few main categories: (1) [CAD] (2) [PDSOFT] (3) [PDMS] (4) [PDS] (5) [smartplant] (6) [cadworx] (7) [Other 3D drawing software]. I was looking for relevant 3D drawing software yesterday as well; I tried searching, but got very few results. If these prefixes are used, then all posts related to such software can be found through the search~
Mark it for future editing. The message has been sent in the station’s internal group, but no one has responded yet. As the Grizzly on the 2nd floor said, topics related to technology, theory, stress, and standards are all assigned to their respective sections, with only valves remaining. :L
This classification is also quite good; then the process resources mentioned earlier aren’t needed, right? (1) [Preliminary Feasibility Study] —— Related to process discussions and requests for assistance. (2) [Process] —— Related to process packages, material balance, and heat balance. (3) [System] —— Related to PID discussions, fluid dynamics calculations, pump calculations, and pipe fitting calculations. (4) [Safety & Environment] —— Related to process safety. (5) [Layout] —— Related to equipment layout and plant layout. (6) [Piping] —— Related to piping selection and piping discussions (piping materials should be discussed in the pipes and valves section, while stress-related topics should be in the stress section). (7) [Other] —— Posts that fall outside the above categories. Is this the correct classification? Take a look at the bear version again~
I was wondering, should the materials for pipes/fittings be discussed in your version? Because I didn’t discuss the materials inside~
I don’t know~ There are things like arrangements, theories, materials, standards, and so on. . .
More or less, my understanding is slightly different: (1) [Preliminary feasibility study] – pilot tests, project proposal, feasibility study, preliminary (conceptual) design (that is, only the design tasks are defined, while the design of the production process is not specified), along with discussions on the relevant technical and economic indicators. (2) [Process] – Related to process packages, material balance, heat balance, separation calculations, equipment selection, etc. (3) [System] – PID analysis, fluid dynamics calculations, pump calculations, detailed calculations of heat exchangers, calculations related to pipe fittings and accessories, preparation of equipment data sheets, and preparation of pipeline diagrams (only temperature and pressure are considered; what about materials for pipes and valves?) ） (4) [Safety and Environment] – Related to process safety, environmental protection, hygiene, occupational safety, and earthquake resistance. (5) [Layout] – Related to equipment layout and plant layout. (6) [Piping] – Related to piping selection and piping design (piping materials are covered in the pipe and valve section, while stress-related aspects are covered in the stress section). (7) [Others] – Posts that fall outside the above categories. ---------------------------- My approach is to list 【Preliminary Feasibility Study】 separately, as it involves a very high level of technical complexity; although it is led by the process engineering team, it involves many different specialties. The other 2-6 items are all in accordance with the task allocation of the design institute. 2-4 are the main tasks of the process room, while 5-6 are primarily the responsibilities of the large-pipe division in the piping room (there should be a separate section for water supply and drainage, but it’s fine to discuss it here as well). The material enters the pipe and valve area, and stress enters the stress area
Well, indeed, it looks much simpler that way. Can subcategories be further divided under a main category?