HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

“I’m saving energy; where are you? “Petrochemical 303: Shutdown of the liquefied gas desulfurization feed pump”

2016-06-05View Original

Thread Content

Disabling the feed pump for liquefied gas desulfurization helps save electricity. In the original design, the stabilized liquefied gas was pumped into the feed buffer tank of the liquefied gas desulfurization extraction tower, and then pumped out again before being sent to the tower. After making changes to the process, the stabilized liquefied gas goes directly into the liquefied gas desulfurization extraction tower, which allows the feed pump for the refined liquefied gas desulfurization extraction tower to be disabled, thereby saving electricity. For example: 45 Kw * 8000 hours = 360,000 Kw; 360,000 Kw * 0.8 yuan/Kw = 288,000 yuan. This savings is quite significant. There are many similar examples; by altering the process and disabling certain pumps, energy can be saved
Reply #22016-06-15
We stopped using one transfer pump after conducting calculations, which also achieved energy-saving results

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.