Should one make the production process public in order to lead the way to prosperity?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by *nht1 on 2016-6-7 at 13:21. Here is a news update we have just received: according to information sent back by our undercover reporter Wang, the topic for the 2016 Sichuan college entrance examination essay, which is said to be the toughest in history, was as follows: Someone developed a new method for making flower tea, but this method was quickly imitated, resulting in many fake and low-quality products on the market; he was concerned that this would damage the integrity of that market. Thus, the manufacturing process was made public, and industry standards were established. In the end, the market was regulated, and he himself became a leader in achieving wealth. Students are required to come up with their own title based on the material and write an 800-word essay. Regarding the above essay topic, please write your personal opinions in more than 10 characters. CCVA is bringing you the news. First*, we invite experts to offer their guidance. @2887848 @1111111 @654262293 @fcxh1111 @geddddd @leo_0088 @li*nji @qugd @szwbuaa @zhjnavy015 @Xinrui Chemicals
I saw it this morning as well; according to the article, the process was made public out of concern over counterfeit and substandard products. In reality, even if it’s made public, fake versions will still exist; the standards set are ones that it’s very difficult for others to meet. According to my understanding of the article’s perspective, the process should be made public; whether it leads to wealth or not, this approach can at least prevent consumers from being deceived.
Effective protection of knowledge innovation is essential to promote technological innovation in China.
The idea is good. But in reality, differences need to be made. Ordinary innovations can be scaled up while protecting intellectual property rights. Special innovations need to be kept confidential or made available on a conditional basis.
From an exam perspective, this is a self-proposed essay. However, I’ve been reading a novel titled Da Ming Wen Kui; the first 350 chapters are devoted to the imperial examinations, covering everything from the initial tests for becoming a student candidate to those required to become a scholar-official. The examinations described in those chapters are similar to this one – a passage is given and the candidates have to analyze it and then present their own opinions (which is similar to what’s required in self-proposed essays)
It’s just an ideal situation. It’s easy to know, but hard to do.
There are two fundamental purposes to filing for patents: first, the number of patents can reflect a company’s level of technological expertise, which is advantageous when applying for patents. Secondly, having one’s own patents can serve as an advantage when accused of patent infringement by the opponent. Under ideal conditions, companies that are leaders in the world can earn hundreds of millions in patent fees each year. In contrast, small companies have their patents copied for free once they are made public; they lack the resources and conditions necessary to protect their intellectual property
Intellectual property rights should be protected; when conventional methods are insufficient, taking indirect approaches can also be an option